lunes, 28 de octubre de 2013

Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing : Nature Biotechnology : Nature Publishing Group

Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing : Nature Biotechnology : Nature Publishing Group

Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing

Nature Biotechnology
doi:10.1038/nbt.2696
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

As more clinically relevant cancer genes are identified, comprehensive diagnostic approaches are needed to match patients to therapies, raising the challenge of optimization and analytical validation of assays that interrogate millions of bases of cancer genomes altered by multiple mechanisms. Here we describe a test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing to characterize base substitutions, short insertions and deletions (indels), copy number alterations and selected fusions across 287 cancer-related genes from routine formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) clinical specimens. We implemented a practical validation strategy with reference samples of pooled cell lines that model key determinants of accuracy, including mutant allele frequency, indel length and amplitude of copy change. Test sensitivity achieved was 95–99% across alteration types, with high specificity (positive predictive value >99%). We confirmed accuracy using 249 FFPE cancer specimens characterized by established assays. Application of the test to 2,221 clinical cases revealed clinically actionable alterations in 76% of tumors, three times the number of actionable alterations detected by current diagnostic tests.

At a glance

Figures

left
  1. NGS-based cancer genomic profiling test workflow.
    Figure 1
  2. Base substitution and indel detection performance.
    Figure 2
  3. CNA detection performance.
    Figure 3
  4. Concordance with clinical testing on FFPE specimens.
    Figure 4
  5. Reproducibility of mutation detection in FFPE specimens.
    Figure 5
  6. Clinically actionable alterations in patient samples.
    Figure 6
right


No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario