domingo, 9 de febrero de 2014

Evaluating the performance of clinical criteria... [Int J Cancer. 2013] - PubMed - NCBI

Evaluating the performance of clinical criteria... [Int J Cancer. 2013] - PubMed - NCBI



 2013 Dec 3. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28650. [Epub ahead of print]

Evaluating the performance of clinical criteria for predicting mismatch repair gene mutations in Lynch syndrome: A comprehensive analysis of 3671 families.

Abstract

Carriers of mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations have a high lifetime risk for colorectal and endometrial cancers, as well as other malignancies. As mutation analysis to detect these patients is expensive and time-consuming, clinical criteria and tumour-tissue analysis are widely used as pre-screening methods. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of commonly applied clinical criteria (the Amsterdam I and II Criteria, and the original and revised Bethesda Guidelines) and the results of tumour-tissue analysis in predicting MMR gene mutations. We analyzed 3671 families from the German HNPCC Registry and divided them into nine mutually exclusive groups with different clinical criteria. A total of 680 families (18.5%) were found to have a pathogenic MMR gene mutation. Among all 1284 families with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer, the overall mutation detection rate was 53.0%. Mutation frequencies and their distribution between the four MMR genes differed significantly between clinical groups (p<0.001). The highest frequencies were found in families fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria (46.4%). Families with loss of MSH2 expression had higher mutation detection rates (69.5%) than families with loss of MLH1 expression (43.1%). MMR mutations were found significantly more often in families with at least one MSI-H small-bowel cancer (p<0.001). No MMR mutations were found among patients under 40-years-old with only colorectal adenoma. Familial clustering of Lynch syndrome-related tumours, early age of onset, and familial occurrence of small-bowel cancer were clinically relevant predictors for Lynch syndrome. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright © 2013 UICC.

KEYWORDS:

Bethesda Guidelines, HNPCC, Lynch Syndrome, clinical diagnostic criteria, mismatch‐repair defects

PMID:
 
24493211
 
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario