sábado, 1 de marzo de 2014

Ahead of Print -Epidemic of Mumps among Vaccinated Persons, the Netherlands, 2009–2012 - Volume 20, Number 4—April 2014 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

full-text ►

Ahead of Print -Epidemic of Mumps among Vaccinated Persons, the Netherlands, 2009–2012 - Volume 20, Number 4—April 2014 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC





Volume 20, Number 4—April 2014

Research

Epidemic of Mumps among Vaccinated Persons, the Netherlands, 2009–2012

Jussi SaneComments to Author , Sigrid Gouma, Marion Koopmans, Hester de Melker, Corien Swaan, Rob van Binnendijk, and Susan Hahné
Author affiliations: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (J. Sane, S. Gouma, M. Koopmans, H. de Melker, C. Swaan, R. van Binnendijk, S. Hahné);European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden (J. Sane)Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (S. Gouma, M. Koopmans)

Abstract

To analyze the epidemiology of a nationwide mumps epidemic in the Netherlands, we reviewed 1,557 notified mumps cases in persons who had disease onset during September 1, 2009–August 31, 2012. Seasonality peaked in spring and autumn. Most case-patients were males (59%), 18–25 years of age (67.9%), and vaccinated twice with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (67.7%). Nearly half (46.6%) of cases occurred in university students or in persons with student contacts. Receipt of 2 doses of vaccine reduced the risk for orchitis, the most frequently reported complication (vaccine effectiveness [VE] 74%, 95% CI 57%–85%); complications overall (VE 76%, 95% CI 61%–86%); and hospitalization (VE 82%, 95% CI 53%–93%). Over time, the age distribution of case-patients changed, and proportionally more cases were reported from nonuniversity cities (p<0.001). Changes in age and geographic distribution over time may reflect increased immunity among students resulting from intense exposure to circulating mumps virus.
Mumps is an acute illness caused by mumps virus (family Paramyxoviridae) and characterized by fever, swelling, and tenderness of >1 salivary gland, usually the parotid gland. Complications associated with mumps include orchitis (inflammation of the testes), meningitis, pancreatitis, and deafness. Mumps virus is spread in respiratory droplets, and the incubation period is 15–24 days (median 19) (1).
Vaccination for mumps has been in use in industrialized countries for decades (2). The Netherlands began mumps vaccination in 1987, using the measles, mumps, and rubella combination vaccine (MMR). The vaccine, containing the Jeryl-Lynn mumps virus strain, is administered in a 2-dose schedule at 14 months and 9 years of age. Vaccination coverage of >1 dose of MMR has consistently been >93% since the introduction of the vaccination program (3). After the MMR program was launched, the incidence of mumps in the Netherlands decreased considerably; nevertheless, during the 2000s, several mumps outbreaks were detected. In 2004, an outbreak occurred among students at an international school (4), and in 2007–2008, an outbreak was detected mainly in a religious community that had low vaccination coverage (5). Since the end of 2009, a countrywide epidemic has been ongoing, affecting mainly student populations (6,7).
Mumps was notifiable in the Netherlands before 1999 and was made notifiable again in December 2008 (5). Mumps surveillance reports are released biweekly or monthly and include data on age and sex distribution, geographic distribution, vaccination, and contact status of case-patients. The report is distributed to public health professionals, including epidemiologists, virologists, and local-level health professionals, but comprehensive spatiotemporal characterization of the surveillance data has not been conducted. To provide information for future mumps prevention efforts, we used this surveillance data to assess the rates of illness and complications associated with the ongoing outbreak, to understand who is at risk for infection, and to assess whether transmission patterns have changed over time.


Acknowledgments

We thank staff at Municipal Health Services, laboratories and clinicians reporting and investigating cases, Hein Boot (deceased) for his contribution to this paper, and Marianne van der Sande for critically reading the manuscript. We also acknowledge the contribution of Jane Whelan, Georgia Ladbury, and Nelly Fournet to mumps surveillance and Daphne Gijselaar and Jeroen Cremer in sequence analyses.
The fellowship of J.S. was funded by the European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

References

  1. Hviid ARubin SMuhlemann KMumps. Lancet2008;371:93244DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. McLean HQHickman CJSeward JFWorld Health Organization Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. The immunological basis for immunization series. Module 16: mumps. Geneva: The Organization; 2010 [cited 2014 Jan 10].http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241500661_eng.pdf Adobe PDF fileExternal Web Site Icon
  3. van Lier EAOomen PJOostenbrug MWZwakhals SLDrijfhout IHde Hoogh PAHigh vaccination coverage of the National Immunization Programme in the Netherlands [in Dutch]Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd2009;153:9507 .PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Brockhoff HJMollema LSonder GJPostema CAvan Binnendijk RSKohl RHMumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated student population, the Netherlands, 2004. Vaccine.2010;28:29326DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Snijders BEvan Lier Avan de Kassteele JFanoy EBRuijs WLHulshof FMumps vaccine effectiveness in primary schools and households, the Netherlands, 2008.Vaccine2012;30:29993002DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Greenland KWhelan JFanoy EBorgert MHulshof KYap KBMumps outbreak among vaccinated university students associated with a large party, the Netherlands, 2010.Vaccine2012;30:467680DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Whelan Jvan Binnendijk RGreenland KFanoy EKhargi MYap KOngoing mumps outbreak in a student population with high vaccination coverage, Netherlands, 2010.Euro Surveill2010;15:19554 .PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Cortese MMJordan HTCurns ATQuinlan PAEns KADenning PMMumps vaccine performance among university students during a mumps outbreak. Clin Infect Dis.2008;46:117280DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Deeks SLLim GHSimpson MAGagne LGubbay JKristjanson EAn assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada. CMAJ.2011;183:101420DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. Calvert NAshton JRGarnett EMumps outbreak in private schools: public health lessons for the post-Wakefield era. Lancet2013;381:16256DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  11. Barskey AESchulte CRosen JBHandschur EFRausch-Phung EDoll MKMumps outbreak in Orthodox Jewish communities in the United States. N Engl J Med.2012;367:170413DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  12. Plotkin SACorrelates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol.2010;17:105565DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  13. Smits GMollema LHahne Sde Melker HTcherniaeva IWaaijenborg SSeroprevalence of mumps in the Netherlands: dynamics over a decade with high vaccination coverage and recent outbreaks. PLoS ONE2013;8:e58234DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  14. Jokinen SOsterlund PJulkunen IDavidkin ICellular immunity to mumps virus in young adults 21 years after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination. J Infect Dis2007;196:8617DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  15. Hassan JDean JMoss ECarr MJHall WWConnell JSeroepidemiology of the recent mumps virus outbreaks in Ireland. J Clin Virol2012;53:3204DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  16. Cohen CWhite JMSavage EJGlynn JRChoi YAndrews NVaccine effectiveness estimates, 2004–2005 mumps outbreak, England. Emerg Infect Dis2007;13:127 .PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  17. Ovsyannikova IGJacobson RMDhiman NVierkant RAPankratz VSPoland GAHuman leukocyte antigen and cytokine receptor gene polymorphisms associated with heterogeneous immune responses to mumps viral vaccine. Pediatrics.2008;121:e10919DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  18. Dayan GHRubin SMumps outbreaks in vaccinated populations: are available mumps vaccines effective enough to prevent outbreaks? Clin Infect Dis2008;47:145867DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  19. Farrington CPEstimation of vaccine effectiveness using the screening method. Int J Epidemiol1993;22:7426DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  20. Quinlisk MPMumps control today. J Infect Dis2010;202:6556DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  21. Cortese MMBarskey AETegtmeier GEZhang CNgo LKyaw MHMumps antibody levels among students before a mumps outbreak: in search of a correlate of immunity. J Infect Dis2011;204:141322DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  22. Hahné SWhelan Jvan Binnendijk RSwaan CFanoy EBoot HMumps vaccine effectiveness against orchitis. Emerg Infect Dis2012;18:1913DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  23. Yung CFAndrews NBukasa ABrown KERamsay MMumps complications and effects of mumps vaccination, England and Wales, 2002–2006. Emerg Infect Dis.2011;17:6617DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  24. Opstelten WHahne SJvan Roijen JHvan Paridon LWolters BSwaan CMMumps makes a comeback [in Dutch]Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd2012;156:A5187 .PubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  25. Everberg GDeafness following mumps. Acta Otolaryngol1957;48:397403DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  26. Hashimoto HFujioka MKinumaki HAn office-based prospective study of deafness in mumps. Pediatr Infect Dis J2009;28:1735DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  27. Ogbuanu IUKutty PKHudson JMBlog DAbedi GRGoodell SImpact of a third dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine on a mumps outbreak. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1567–74.External Web Site Icon

Figure

Tables

Suggested citation for this article: Sane J, Gouma S, Koopmans M, de Melker H, Swaan C, van Binnendijk R, et al. Epidemic of mumps among vaccinated persons, the Netherlands, 2009–2012. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2014 Apr [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2004.131681External Web Site Icon
DOI: 10.3201/eid2004.131681

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario