domingo, 23 de marzo de 2014

Comparing universal Lynch syndrome tumor-screening programs to evaluate associations between implementation strategies and patient follow-through : Genetics in Medicine : Nature Publishing Group

Comparing universal Lynch syndrome tumor-screening programs to evaluate associations between implementation strategies and patient follow-through : Genetics in Medicine : Nature Publishing Group



Comparing universal Lynch syndrome tumor-screening programs to evaluate associations between implementation strategies and patient follow-through

Genetics in Medicine
 
(2014)
 
doi:10.1038/gim.2014.31
Received
 
Accepted
 
Published online 

Abstract

Purpose:

Universal tumor screening (UTS) for all colorectal cancer patients can improve the identification of Lynch syndrome, the most common cause of hereditary colorectal cancer. This multiple-case study explored how variability in UTS procedures influenced patient follow-through (PF) with germ-line testing after a screen-positive result.

Methods:

Data were obtained through Web-based surveys and telephone interviews with institutional informants. Institutions were categorized as Low-PF (≤10% underwent germ-line testing), Medium-PF (11–40%), or High-PF (>40%). To identify implementation procedures (i.e., conditions) unique to High-PF institutions, qualitative comparative analysis was performed.

Results:

Twenty-one informants from 15 institutions completed surveys and/or interviews. Conditions present among all five High-PF institutions included the following: (i) disclosure of screen-positive results to patients by genetic counselors; and (ii) genetic counselors either facilitate physician referrals to genetics professionals or eliminate the need for referrals. Although both of these High-PF conditions were present among two Medium-PF institutions, automatic reflex testing was lacking and difficulty contacting screen-positive patients was a barrier. The three remaining Medium-PF and five Low-PF institutions lacked the conditions found in High-PF institutions.

Conclusion:

Methods for streamlining UTS procedures, incorporating a high level of involvement of genetic counselors in tracking and communication of results and in reducing barriers to patient contact, are reviewed within a broader discussion on maximizing the effectiveness and public health impact of UTS.
Genet Med advance online publication 20 March 2014

Keywords:

 
hereditary colorectal cancer; Lynch syndrome; Public Health Genomics; qualitative comparative analysis; RE-AIM

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario