U.S. Could Face Shortage of Cancer Doctors

Gap projected to reach nearly 1,500 specialists in a decade, American Society of Clinical Oncology cautions

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Related MedlinePlus Pages

TUESDAY, March 11, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- People fighting cancer
might have to wait longer to see a cancer specialist in the coming
decades, as demand for treatment outpaces the number of oncologists
entering the workforce, a new report released Tuesday warns.

Demand for cancer treatments is expected to grow by 42 percent or
more by 2025, while the supply of oncologists will only increase by 28
percent, experts found.

The mismatch between supply and demand could result in a shortage of
nearly 1,500 oncologists by 2025, according to the American Society of
Clinical Oncology (ASCO) report.

People living in rural areas will be hardest hit by the shortage, the
report predicted. Currently, only 3 percent of oncologists are based in
rural areas, even though that's where 20 percent of Americans live.

"We never want to have a cancer patient have to wait to get in to see
a cancer physician," said Dr. Richard Schilsky, ASCO's chief medical
officer. "Since we're aware of the issue, we are beginning to think
about how to mitigate it."

Schilsky said he believes oncologists will need to rely on
primary-care physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants to
handle basic cancer treatment and follow-up care as demand for services
grows. "That will leave the oncologists time to deal with the more
complex cancer patients," he explained.

Certain factors will likely combine to increase the number of
patients seeking cancer treatment in coming years, Schilsky said,
including:

The aging of the baby boomer generation. "They are now all in their
60s, and that's the age at the highest risk for getting cancer," he
said.
Improved cancer treatment. A record 13.7 million cancer survivors
now live in the United States, Schilsky said, and many want to maintain a
relationship with their oncologist even though they are cancer-free.
Health care reform. "There are going to be millions of people who
didn't previously have health insurance and [who] will be seeking care
for cancer," Schilsky said.

The total annual cost of cancer care in the United States is
projected to reach $175 billion by 2020, an increase of 40 percent from
2010, according to the report.

The ASCO report predicted that there won't be enough cancer doctors on hand to meet this demand.

One expert not involved with the report agreed that a large gap in specialists is looming.

"I personally think it's a topic we know is going on in the oncology
community, but when you're talking about the big picture of health care
these things can get overlooked," said Dr. Janna Andrews, an attending
physician in the department of radiation medicine at the North Shore-LIJ
Cancer Institute in Lake Success, N.Y.

Andrews said people in rural areas already are feeling the effects of
a shortfall. "You probably see that now in the more rural areas, where
you are diagnosed with cancer and then you find the closest center to
treat you is over two hours away," she said.

Another issue is that the field has its own aging workforce, the ASCO report noted.

"About 20 percent of currently practicing oncologists are now
approaching the retirement age of 65," Schilsky said. The number of
oncologists older than 64 exceeded those under 40 for the first time in
2008, and the gap is expected to widen.

Dr. Steven Paulson, an oncologist and hematologist at Texas Oncology,
a US Oncology Network affiliate in Dallas, said some oncology practices
are struggling.

"The challenges facing practicing medical oncologists are making it
very difficult for small and even medium-sized oncology practices to
survive," Paulson said. "Many older physicians will simply retire,
worsening the shortages already projected."

And the supply of new graduates is not likely to keep pace with
demand, according to ASCO. As pressure builds, many cancer doctors are
likely to burn out and either reduce their clinical hours or leave the
field altogether, the report suggested.

"Oncology is a very, very demanding specialty where you have to be
available 24/7," Schilsky said. "You are dealing with people who face
life-threatening illnesses, many of whom will succumb to that illness.
There's this work-life balance we have to figure out how to deal with."

Oncologists might be able to help the situation by shifting some of
their simpler cancer treatments to highly trained nurse practitioners or
physician assistants. "Once they are properly trained, they have the
skills to handle uncomplicated cancer patients," Schilsky said.

Primary-care physicians also can play a role, by taking over the care
of cancer survivors. Oncologists can provide a "survivorship care plan"
that will note the potential long-term side effects of a patient's
cancer treatment, as well as their future cancer risk.

"By leveraging all of the resources in the health care system, we think we can mitigate a lot of this," Schilsky said.

The federal government also can help by steering more money toward training new oncologists.

Most new doctors require two to three years in an oncology fellowship
before they are ready to practice, and Medicare pays for the first year
of this training in virtually all cancer teaching programs, Schilsky
said.

But Medicare funding for medical training has been ratcheting down,
he said, and that has constrained the number of doctors who can seek out
an oncology fellowship.

"It's limiting the availability of fellowship slots, even for people
who are interested in getting that training," Schilsky said.

SOURCE: Richard Schilsky, M.D., chief medical officer, American
Society of Clinical Oncology; Janna Andrews, M.D., attending physician,
department of radiation medicine, North Shore-LIJ Cancer Institute, Lake
Success, N.Y.; Steven Paulson, M.D., oncologist and hematologist, Texas
Oncology, US Oncology Network affiliate, Dallas; March 11, 2014, ASCO
report, The State of Cancer Care in America: 2014

HealthDay