BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics
We missed this, sorry, but October 21 was #BackToTheFutureDay, the day Marty McFly travelled to in Back to the Future II. The internet was abuzz with the kind of stuff the internet buzzes about better than anyone else and even POTUS tweeted “Ever think about the fact that we live in the future we dreamed of then? That's heavy, man.”
But with all the palaver about time travel, the only person who studied the bioethical conundrums of time travel was Dr Janet D. Stemwedel, a columnist for Forbes who specialises in time machine ethics. She took seriously a question posed on Twitter by the New York Times Magazine: “If you could go back and kill Hitler as a baby, would you do it?” (Only 42% said yes!)
First of all, she notes that this is question that only a utilitarian will take seriously. Killing an innocent child now is deemed right because it will prevent great evils later. But she counters: “Given all the moving parts in a world of many people who raised, nurtured, enabled, and assisted Adolf Hitler, why is baby Hitler the moving part to eliminate? If you gamble on killing this baby, who has done nothing wrong and for whom there is no guarantee yet of eventually committing the horrors you hope to prevent, aren’t you using the kind of logic that could justify mass exterminations of other people?"
Furthermore, given the large number of people who shared Hitler’s depraved ideas, someone else would probably step into the gap left by his non-existence. She concludes: “In the process of trying to avoid a great harm that, at the stage of Hitler’s infancy, is in no way inevitable, you’ve made yourself a baby killer, which is surely a harm to baby Hitler, to his survivors, and (if you have any kind of conscience) to you.”
Sound advice, readers, if you ever get your hands on a reliable time machine.
Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
Editor
BioEdge
| This week in BioEdge | |
by Xavier Symons | Nov 07, 2015
Medecins San Frontieres has accused the US special forces of “war crimes” after an American AC-130 gunship attacked a field hospital in the northern Afghan…by Michael Cook | Nov 07, 2015
A British man chooses to die rather than lose his leg.by Michael Cook | Nov 07, 2015
The international market for surrogacy is proving to be very resilient in the face of legal and social disruptionby Xavier Symons | Nov 07, 2015
The Indian government has introduced strict new laws that will prohibit foreigners from commissioning Indian women to bear their children.by Michael Cook | Nov 07, 2015
Internet giants move into medical research.by Xavier Symons | Nov 07, 2015
A British GP caught in a newspaper sting suspended for three months after authorising a sex-selective abortion.by Michael Cook | Nov 07, 2015
"You can't hide behind a white lab coat and commit crimes," says DA.by Xavier Symons | Nov 07, 2015
Bioethicist Bonnie Steinbock suggests assisted death for psychiatric cases is the logical consequence of current euthanasia legislation.by Michael Cook | Nov 07, 2015
Woman sentenced to life for enslaving and torturing disabled people.by Silvia Camporesi | Nov 07, 2015
The new play Tomcat tests our views about eliminating "neurodiverse" children.BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
Email: michael@bioedge.org
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario