sábado, 7 de mayo de 2016

Existential risk #2: gene editing a potential WMD?

Existential risk #2: gene editing a potential WMD?



Existential risk #2: gene editing a potential WMD?
     




In February this year, the US Director of Intelligence James R. Clapper named gene-editing technology as “a potential weapon of mass destruction”. Clapper told US Congress that rouge states might use gene-editing techniques to manufacture biological weapons.

“In countries with different regulatory or ethical standards, it increases the risk of the creation of potentially harmful biological agents”.
The remarks sparked discussion among bioethicists about the possibility of misuse of gene-editing techniques. Here’s what a few had to say.

University of California San Francisco bioethics professor Barbara Koenig:

“Those individuals who don't follow the rules would essentially be ostracized. But I understand how you could be concerned that self-regulation is enough.”
Columbia University bioethicist Robert Klitzman:

“I think that this is a very powerful technology…I think as a result that there are things that need to be done that have not yet been talked about.”“The infectious agent responsible for bubonic plague, if altered through Crispr, could potentially be used as a WMD. Currently, we have effective treatment against it. But if it were altered, it could potentially become resistant to these treatments and thus be deadly.”
Edinburgh University bioethicist Sarah Chan told The Guardian technology that could make diseases more infectious and dangerous has existed for decades, as have the questions around it.

“Some of the fears and concerns surrounding genome editing technology are, if not overblown, perhaps misdirected.”
Piers Millet, an expert on bioweapons at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., said Clapper’s singling out of gene editing on the WMD list was “a surprise,” since making a bioweapon—say, an extra-virulent form of anthrax—still requires mastery of a “wide raft of technologies.”
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/existential-risk-2-gene-editing-a-potential-wmd/11866#sthash.jBv36TGt.dpuf



Bioedge



BioEdge was launched in 2001, in the week that President George W. Bush announced his administration's policy on human embryonic stem cell research. That fuelled a huge debate about a field of science which very few people had ever heard of, let alone thought deeply about. Ever since we've been chronicling the debates surrounding the ever-expanding empire of bioethics. 
As we celebrate our 15th anniversary, we are also promoting a fund-raising drive over the next four weeks. The BioEdge newsletter is free, but it is increasingly expensive to produce. This year we are hoping to raise $15,000. 
Cheers,


Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge

This week in BioEdge
 
by Xavier Symons | May 07, 2016
Policy analysts in the US and UK are calling for an augmentation of the decades-old 14-day embryo experimentation rule.
 
by Michael Cook | May 07, 2016
Steep rise in end-stage psychiatric disorders and dementia.
 
by Xavier Symons | May 07, 2016
Public health executives see a big positive in the US opioid tragedies – increased organ donation.
 
by Xavier Symons | May 07, 2016
Here’s what a few bioethicists have to say.
 
by Xavier Symons | May 07, 2016
Human beings are more likely to die in a mass extinction event than a car crash, according to a new report on existential risk.
 
by Michael Cook | May 07, 2016
... but supports altruistic surrogacy
 
by Michael Cook | May 07, 2016
Falun Gong supporters query government announcements
 
by Michael Cook | May 07, 2016
Proof-of-concept clinical trials on 20 patients in India
 
by Michael Cook | May 07, 2016
Overwhelmingly against germline modification
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

Bioedge

Existential risk #2: gene editing a potential WMD?

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario