viernes, 24 de junio de 2016

CDC - Prevention Status Reports (PSR) - National Summary - Teen Pregnancy - STLT Gateway

CDC - Prevention Status Reports (PSR) - National Summary - Teen Pregnancy - STLT Gateway

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People



Prevention Status Reports

Teen Pregnancy

PSR NATIONAL SUMMARY




Icon of a female holding a newborn baby



The Prevention Status Reports highlight—for all 50 states and the District of Columbia—the status of public health policies and practices designed to address 10 important public health problems and concerns. This report highlights the status of a key policy that states can use to reduce teen pregnancy: increasing access to contraceptive counseling and services by expanding the age and income eligibility levels for Medicaid coverage of family planning services to increase teens’ access to healthcare services, including contraception and other preventive services.
Prior to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), women qualified for full Medicaid coverage only if their incomes were very low and they belonged to one of Medicaid’s categories of eligibility—parent, senior, or disabled. Pregnant women were eligible for prenatal, delivery, and newborn care at a somewhat higher income level but generally lost coverage soon after delivery. Since the 1990s, many states have broadened Medicaid eligibility for family planning services and supplies for people who were not otherwise eligible for Medicaid (1). Many states offered family planning services to women at higher income levels through waivers applied for and granted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The ACA included an option for states to expand full Medicaid services to individuals based on income eligibility alone. Another ACA provision allowed states to make coverage for family planning services available at the same income level as for pregnancy care through a state plan amendment (2–7). Thus, states have three options to provide Medicaid coverage for family planning services to low-income individuals. Income-based Medicaid expansions have been shown to be effective in reducing births among teens aged 15–19 years (2–5).
States can expand access to their Medicaid family planning program and reduce teen births by 1) extending coverage to teens under age 18 years and 2) setting the income eligibility level for family planning coverage to at least the same income level required for pregnancy care coverage (this level varies by state). Expanding Medicaid coverage for family planning services is consistent with US Department of Health and Human Services recommendations to support reproductive and sexual health services (8) and with Healthy People 2020 family planning objectives (9). Other strategies for reducing teen pregnancy that are supported by scientific evidence include providing sexual health education for adolescents, using positive youth development approaches, and improving parent-child communication and parental monitoring of youth behavior (10–13).

Expansion of state Medicaid family planning eligibility

State expansion of eligibility for Medicaid coverage of family planning services to include teens under age 18 years and to be set to at least the income eligibility level for coverage of pregnancy care (this level varies by state).
Bar chart showing the number of states rated green, yellow, and red for Expansion of state Medicaid family planning eligibility in the 2013 PSRs and 2015 PSRs, along with a table showing the rating scale. In 2013, of states with available data, 14 states rated green, 21 states rated yellow, and 16 states rated red. In 2015, of states with available data, 14 states rated green, 30 states rated yellow, and 7 states rated red. Green means the state Medicaid family planning eligibility is income-based, meets the income eligibility level for pregnancy-related care, and covers all women including teens. Yellow means the state Medicaid family planning eligibility is limited, not income-based, does not meet the eligibility level for pregnancy-related services, and or excludes some teens. Red means the state Medicaid family planning eligibility is not expanded. States with missing data are not included. (State count includes the District of Columbia).
How These Ratings Were Determined
These ratings reflect the extent to which each state had expanded eligibility for Medicaid coverage of family planning services. A review of state Medicaid family planning waivers and state plan amendments (SPAs) was conducted to determine whether each state’s income eligibility level for family planning coverage was set to at least the same income level as for pregnancy care coverage (14,15). The income eligibility level for family planning services extended to applicants whose income was up to 5 percentage points above the set FPL for the following states: Alabama, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin. This review also examined the extent to which state waivers or SPAs covered all teens, regardless of pregnancy status (14). In addition, a review was conducted of those states that had expanded their Medicaid programs under the ACA to cover adults aged <65 years with incomes up to 138% of the FPL (16). Teens aged ≤18 years with family incomes up to 138% of the FPL (or higher, depending on the state) are eligible for free or low-cost health coverage, including family planning services, in all states that have expanded Medicaid.
**State count includes the District of Columbia

References

  1. Sills S, Johnson B. Medicaid 1115 family planning demonstration waiver programs[PDF-267KB]. State Health Policy Monitor 2008;2(4).
  2. Foster DG, Biggs MA, Rostovtseva D, et al. Estimating the fertility effect of expansions of publicly funded family planning services in California. Women’s Health Issues 2011;21(6):418–24.
  3. Yang Z, Gaydos LM. Reasons for and challenges of recent increases in teen birth rates: a study of family planning service policies and demographic changes at the state level. Journal of Adolescent Health 2010;46(6):517–24.
  4. Lindrooth RC, McCullough JS. The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births. Women's Health Issues 2007;17(2):66–74.
  5. Kearney MS, Levine PB. Subsidized contraception, fertility, and sexual behavior. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2009;91(1):137.
  6. Edwards J, Bronstein J, Adams K. Evaluation of Medicaid family planning demonstrations. In: CMS Contract No 752-2-415921. Arlington, VA: The CNA Corporation; 2003.
  7. Thomas A. Policy Solutions for Preventing Unplanned Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2012.
  8. US Department of Health and Human Services. National Prevention Strategy: America's Plan for Better Health and Wellness[PDF-4.6MB]. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
  9. US Department of Health and Human Services. Family Planning. In: Healthy People 2020. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
  10. US Department of Health and Human Services. Educational and Community-Based Programs. In: Healthy People 2020. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
  11. Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM, Eko H, et al. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009(4):CD005215.
  12. US Department of Health and Human Services. Evidence-Based Programs. Accessed Jun 10, 2015.
  13. Chin HB, Sipe TA, Elder R, et al. The effectiveness of group-based comprehensive risk-reduction and abstinence education interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted infections: two systematic reviews for the Guide to Community Preventive Services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012;42(3):272–94.
  14. Guttmacher Institute. State Policies in Brief (as of November 1, 2015): Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions[PDF-7.8KB]. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2015.
  15. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Table 3: Pregnant Women Income Eligibility Limits as a Percent of the Federal Poverty Level, January 2015[PDF-104.9KB]. In: Modern Era Medicaid: Findings from a 50-State Survey of Eligibility, Enrollment, Renewal, and Cost-Sharing Policies in Medicaid and CHIP as of January 2015 [PDF-1.5MB]. Washington, DC: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2015.
  16. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid Income Eligibility Limits for Adults as a Percent of the Federal Poverty Level. Updated Nov 2015. In: Modern Era Medicaid: Findings from a 50-State Survey of Eligibility, Enrollment, Renewal, and Cost-Sharing Policies in Medicaid and CHIP as of January 2015 [PDF-1.5MB]. Washington, DC: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2015.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario